Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Helena Mariposa's avatar

I believe a good story will provoke questions, thoughts, and dialog. Your story evoked all three responses for me. A major issue that presented itself via the discussion of the stars throughout the story was the fact that all perspectives on reality are relative or multidimensional, and ephemeral.

This notion is further amplified when one thinks about the perspectives on the King vs the Queen. The King could be considered as a clever scientist, who learned of the stars by studying them closely, and the Queen could be considered greedy and uninspired by demanding more. On the other hand, the King, who calls himself a scientist, could be seen as a dreamer who is not in touch with what is real, while the Queen could be viewed as a scientist, a rationalist, who demands proof of the existence of what the King is claiming and is a skeptic, as many Western scientists are.

The issue can be demonstrated on another level, when one thinks about the Western perspective vs the Eastern one. The Western one might be influenced by a more accepting view of women, while the Eastern one might be influenced by a more conservative one. Or the Eastern storytelling perspective might embrace the notion of the stars as expressed by the King, whereas the Western perspective might demand a what could be considered a more “realistic”, practical, material approach like the Queen did.

All in all, this is just one perspective. Whether it will make sense to others or not, I don’t know. What I do know is that this is an excellent story.

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Tom Simpson's avatar

This reminded me a great deal of some of A. S. Byatt's more mystical short stories. The narrative is more distant but there is that same sense of a familiar yet disjointed mythos.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts